• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For subjects who lived in the early-to-mid 20th century: vapereduction have you ever thought of if there is perhaps an older photograph that has fallen in the public domain? For topics who died not too long ago: have you ever made an inexpensive effort to search out individuals who would possibly possess images of this individual and could be prepared to launch one? I have learn the Wikipedia guidelines on Non-free content material, and I'll explain how this file meets all of the factors set on the market.

This can only work in case you are already logged in there, which is likely the case when you've got a unified account. Please examine the spelling, and vapemalluk be sure you enter the identify of an present article during which you will embrace this file. This is some other kind of non-free work that I believe is authentic Fair Use. This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I consider it is Fair Use. Such files normally can't be used even below the "Fair Use" rules, except in uncommon instances.

Most pictures on the web are underneath copyright and belong to any individual, even if you believe the owner won't care about that copyright. Really, please don't. Even in case you think it might make for a great addition to an article. This picture can be proven as a major means of visual identification at the highest of the article dedicated to the person in query.

Check right here to see if you are logged in.

Please observe the hyperlink and vapedutch examine that the picture description web page has all the knowledge you meant to incorporate. Then, after importing, open the picture description page for enhancing and vapingonline add your separate explanations for each extra article manually. Yes, I want this file to be immediately out there in all Wikimedia projects, vapedealuk in all languages. Do not go through this upload form once more, except you wish to exchange the actual file with a new version.

For a file to be deemed replaceable, it isn't vital that an appropriate alternative already exists. It will be used as the primary means of visual identification of that person within the article about them. This is the cowl or dustjacket of a e book, the cover of a CD or vapemalluk video, the official release poster of a movie, or vapemalluk a comparable item.

Which of these options describes this item finest? Add any rationalization or proof necessary to substantiate your statement above.

It is a copyrighted work whose use doesn't fall into any of the lessons above. The article as an entire is devoted particularly to this work. Text is on the market under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; further terms could apply. Please explain why this function could not be served by textual content alone. If vital, please clarify why this function can't be achieved by way of text alone. A short description of why you're overwriting this file.

Please clarify why this purpose couldn't be served with an alternate, free illustration that might yet be discovered or created.