• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) consists of issues such as access, waiting lists, health care coverage, and different scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly financed health care system of England, produced under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour government of Clement Attlee. It has come under much criticism, especially during the early 2000s, due to outbreaks of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the involvement of the NHS in scandals extends back many years, consisting of over the arrangement of psychological health care in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on medical facility newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which soared from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]

Access controls and waiting lists

In making healthcare a mostly "undetectable cost" to the patient, healthcare seems to be efficiently totally free to its customers - there is no specific NHS tax or levy. To reduce expenses and make sure that everybody is dealt with equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) functions as a main gatekeeper - without a recommendation from a GP, it is frequently impossible to gain higher courses of treatment, such as a visit with a consultant. These are argued to be essential - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in the House of Commons, "we shall never have all we need ... expectations will constantly go beyond capacity". [2] On the other hand, the nationwide medical insurance systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have actually dispensed with the need for recommendation; direct access to a professional is possible there. [3]

There has actually been concern about opportunistic "health tourists" travelling to Britain (primarily London) and utilizing the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British residents have actually been known to travel to other European countries to take benefit of lower expenses, and since of a worry of hospital-acquired extremely bugs and long waiting lists. [5]

NHS gain access to is therefore controlled by medical concern rather than rate system, resulting in waiting lists for both assessments and surgical treatment, up to months long, although the Labour federal government of 1997-onwards made it among its key targets to decrease waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation could be 2 years; there were ambitions to decrease it to 18 weeks despite opposition from physicians. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical complaint is acute and lethal, a patient will reach the front of the line rapidly.

The NHS determines medical need in regards to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), an approach of quantifying the advantage of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this method of assigning healthcare indicates some clients should lose out in order for others to gain, which QALY is a crude method of making life and death choices. [8]

Hospital acquired infections

There have been several deadly outbreaks of antibiotic resistant germs (" super bugs") in NHS hospitals, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has led to criticism of standards of health throughout the NHS, with some patients buying private medical insurance or travelling abroad to prevent the perceived danger of capturing a "very bug" while in medical facility. However, the department of health vowed ₤ 50 million for a "deep tidy" of all NHS England healthcare facilities in 2007. [10]

Coverage

The lack of availability of some treatments due to their viewed bad cost-effectiveness sometimes results in what some call a "postcode lottery game". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the very first gatekeeper, and examine the cost efficiency of all drugs. Until they have provided guidance on the expense and effectiveness of brand-new or costly medications, treatments and procedures, NHS services are not likely to offer to money courses of treatment. The exact same of true of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's counterpart in Scotland. [13]

There has actually been significant debate about the general public health funding of costly drugs, significantly Herceptin, due to its high cost and perceived minimal total survival. The project waged by cancer sufferers to get the federal government to spend for their treatment has actually gone to the highest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it accredited. [14] [15] Your Home of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug business for bringing in drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limitation that is considered the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.

Private Finance Initiative

Before the idea of private finance effort (PFI) concerned prominence, all brand-new hospital building was by convention funded from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise cash and able to manage public sector expenditure. In June 1994, the Capital Expense Manual (CIM) was released, setting out the terms of PFI agreements. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (building of brand-new facilities) had to take a look at whether PFI was more suitable to utilizing public sector financing. By the end of 1995, 60 fairly small projects had been prepared for, at an overall expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were built and serviced by the economic sector, and then leased back to the NHS. The Labour federal government chosen under Tony Blair in 1997 welcomed PFI projects, believing that public costs required to be curtailed. [16]

Under the personal financing initiative, an increasing variety of hospitals have been developed (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the government likewise motivated economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been significant criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health showing that for every single ₤ 200 million spent on privately funded healthcare facilities the NHS loses 1000 medical professionals and nurses. The first PFI health centers consist of some 28% less beds than the ones they changed. [18] In addition to this, it has been kept in mind that the return for building business on PFI agreements could be as high as 58%, which in centers from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS almost half a billion pounds more every year. [19]

Scandals

Several high-profile medical scandals have actually occurred within the NHS throughout the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including kids's organs, between 1988 and 1995. The main report into the event, the Redfern Report, exposed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had bought the "dishonest and prohibited removing of every organ from every kid who had had a postmortem." In reaction, it has been argued that the scandal brought the problem of organ and tissue donation into the general public domain, and highlighted the advantages to medical research study that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s regarded opioid deaths. [21]

The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried unusually high death rates amongst clients at the hospital. [22] [23] As much as 1200 more clients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of healthcare facility [24] [25] based on figures from a mortality design, but the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misleading to link the insufficient care to a particular number or variety of numbers of deaths. [26] A public inquiry later revealed multiple circumstances of disregard, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]

" Lack of independence of looking for security and fitness for function"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated health care, NHS England is worked on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with inspecting if the care delivered by the NHS is really safe and fit for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC describes itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it remains in fact "responsible to the public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its funding originates from the taxpayer. At least one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.

There is therefore the capacity for a conflict of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the exact same leadership and both are highly prone to political interference.

In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins advised NHS England to prioritize proof and security in gender dysphoria treatment following issues raised by the Cass Review. NHS required cooperation from adult centers and started a review, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum slammed restrictions on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall welcomed the evaluation's focus on kids's wellness. [28] [29]

See also

National Health Service
List of hospitals in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission


Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The General Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the original on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a regular data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher guidelines to make sure that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health tourists could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors assault Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the initial on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the initial on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do health centers make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleansing under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery game'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the original on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the initial on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to perform thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the original on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI healthcare facilities 'costing NHS additional ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances needed for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport hospital deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, watchdog says". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'must be criminal offense'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have caused 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford health center scandal: Approximately 1,200 may have died over "shocking" patient care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "How lots of people passed away "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit healthcare facility leaves cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister tells NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult centers". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in children's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References

Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.


External links

NHS.


Further reading

Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.